Author: Bambi

Many thanks to the New Wark Times for this shocking, yet not surprising, article:

Phinney cited for violating Sackville’s new Code of Conduct

Bambi knows VERY well two facts in our town:

First, the shenanigans of our town’s council are legendary. They sadly know no shame and no limits. Today, we have another evidence of this reality. Regardless of the different format of meetings, physical or virtual, some things just remain unchanged.

Second, Councillor Bruce Phinney is one of the VERY rare PRINCIPLED politicians. With all due respect to Sackville’s public servants, he is perhaps our best town councillor. Make no mistake, Bambi is not saying this because he cannot be wrong. Of course, he can at times, like all of us. Bambi is stating this simply because Councillor Phinney is always true to both his principles AND his constituents.

Bearing this in mind, we all know what it means to accuse him of violating a so-called (new) code of conduct.

Actually, such accusation is like a double-edged sword. One one hand, it serves to corner and silence him. On the other hand, it is an honour for him, morally speaking. Here is why: Councillor Phinney speaks his mind. His opinions are not for sale. He looks at the evidence, with an attention to details. He also sees the bigger picture very lucidly. He has a continuity in his thoughts. Most importantly, he is not afraid of saying the truth as it is. He stands up for his values, for the citizens he represents, and for justice for the sake of justice. He does neither virtue signal nor gain anything in return of his opinions.

Thank you Councillor Phinney for whom you are.Today, it is our turn to stand up for you. Through you, we stand up for both common sense and justice in our town. Enough of control to hide we do not know what. Enough of control to hide behind we do not care what. Today, it is a code of conduct. Tomorrow, it will be another invention. Enough childlessness. Sackvillians deserve a better practice of politics.

Thus, using the platform of her personal blog, as a citizen of Sackville, Bambi VERY strongly condemns these accusations, altogether. She also FULLY supports Councillor Bruce Phinney. We need MORE of him… We need MORE politicians like him, not just in Sackville but also in Fredericton, Ottawa, Beirut, the rest of the world… !

To conclude this post, there are no words more powerful than those of Ms. Sharon’s Hicks (comments already published on the New Wark Times). Bambi will allow herself to highlight them again below. Thank you Ms. Hicks for being simply SO RIGHT. Please read her comment until the end, without missing her clever bolded question!

SHARON HICKS (taken from the New Wark Times, please see the link above):

“This latest updated version of the Code of Conduct for Councilors was passed in March of this year, which added even more ‘control features’ to the previous version from 2017. Here is the link to the document, located on the Town website – https://sackville.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/271-Code-of-Conduct-By-Law.pdf

When you read through the entire by-law, as I have done several times, and consider the potential ramifications of each individual section, it presents as a document seemingly designed to control [Councilors] to the highest degree possible, as [Councilor] Phinney has pointed out.

While it is indeed essential for all elected officials to present themselves with a high degree of professionalism and courtesy, and to represent the best interests of the citizens who elect them, one could ask why this ‘extreme’ level of control is deemed to be necessary, and by whom.

If I were considering running for Sackville Town Council, after reading this document I would definitely have reservations about putting myself in that position where I would basically be ‘muzzled’, unable to speak up to represent the best interests of our citizens without threat of personal reprimand.

Who is Council elected to represent – the citizens or the bureaucracy?”

Bambi usually likes Mr. Champagne, Minister of Global Affairs Canada (formerly known as Foreign Affairs). She is disappointed to see him not answering a question directly (is he learning from his boss ??). Most importantly, she is disappointed to learn this from the video in the media ( https://globalnews.ca/video/6916567/foreign-affairs-minister-says-canada-is-grateful-for-countries-providing-medical-supplies-including-taiwan): Canada did not thank Taiwan for its kind donation of 25K masks yet?! What is it waiting for? For China’s blessing (or green light)?

We can thank two countries at once, Canada. We can even interact with two countries at once, despite their historical issues (ex. Israel and Palestine, etc.).

So why not apply the same diplomatic logic here?

We can even thank without endorsing or… even without liking an entity. It is called clever diplomacy.

Bambi is disturbed because when she voted for Mr. Trudeau the first time (thank goodness not the second time), her wish was to see Canada re-playing a role at the international scene. Frankly, she is afraid we may be becoming the clown of the world…

Bambi is also sad because, in some regards, Taiwan is like the Lebanon of this world. China is like the Iran of the Middle East, so to speak (larger scale). Yes, Bambi would have appreciated some thoughtful politeness, had Lebanon donated those masks.

Anyhow, to conclude this post, regardless of our government’s impolite attitude, Bambi would like to thank Taiwan for its nice gesture toward us!

Following the link below, you can find a translation of an article by Mr. Facal published today in the Journal de Montréal:

https://www.journaldemontreal.com/2020/05/07/trudeau-legault-vous-et-moi

“Since the beginning of this crisis, I defend François Legault, but I have severely criticized Justin Trudeau.

Readers have asked me why the latter is not entitled to the same indulgence as the former.

It’s an honest question that deserves an honest answer.

Easier

If I am more severe with Trudeau, it is not, as readers believe, because I am a sovereignist.

Legault, after all, has turned his back on the cause. So why?

Serious cinephiles may be familiar with an old Stanley Kubrick film entitled Paths of Glory (1957).

The plot matters little.

Suffice to say that, during World War I, Colonel Dax was in the trenches with his men.

Whenever the order to attack was given, he came out of his hole and charged with them.

Bullets whistled. His men fell like flies around him.

Meanwhile, far, far, far from the front, well sheltered in their headquarters, Generals Broulard and Mireau sip champagne while dreaming of glory, medals, and promotions.

I use the film allegorically, you will understand, not to be taken at face value.

Legault and the premiers are in the trenches. They are the ones who receive the bullets.

Hospitals, CHSLDs [long-term care centres], daycares, schools, the decision to close or reopen businesses, to close or not regions, to give us instructions to stay at home or not, to wear a mask or not, all this are decisions of provincial governments.

The sharing of responsibilities is like that in many federations.

In the United States too, while Trump invents his science every day, the governors are at the front.

Does Legault make mistakes? Obviously. As he said on Tuesday, there is no operations manual.

His best reflex was to have grasped the gravity of the situation from the start and acted quickly with the means he had. Not Trudeau.

I was talking about constitutional responsibilities.

Trudeau was responsible for border control and for travelers arriving here.

He was the last in the country to accept that everything had to be closed. How many infected people have returned who have infected others?

Then, at Easter, while you and I were locked up by obligation, he left for the cottage with a wife and children.

But he was kind enough, it’s true, to share beautiful selfies with us.

He then caught up, you say, by spending without counting.

Yes, but it’s our money, our debt, and signing checks is easy.

Fault?

I will be told, if we want to compare equivalent jurisdictions, that Legault does not deserve congratulations since there are more deaths here than in other provinces.

Remember that more than 70% of COVID-19 deaths in Québec took place in residences for the elderly.

However, more than half of the elderly who, in Canada, live in these institutions, neglected for ages, are in Québec.

Legault’s fault?”

Today, 33 new cases among the repatriated Lebanese expats (coming from Nigeria), in addition to one additional case not related to travels.

The coronavirus pandemic may have started later in Africa, or at least in some parts of this continent. Anyhow, it seems to be active now.

Indeed, yesterday, there were 25 positive cases among repatriated citizens (from the Republic of Sierra Lione).  

Bravo to Lebanon for its thoroughness. All the testing and quarantine, at hotels, for all passengers until their results. Of course, those who test positive are quarantined longer:

https://www.moph.gov.lb/en

As shown above, Lebanon’s Ministry of Health publishes anonymous lab results of expatriates, coming through the airport and those crossing land borders (still closed). Yesterday, there two positive cases in two different crossings, among 91 total tests.

All negative cases will be quarantined at home under strict daily surveillance by the Ministry of Health. In case of symptoms, the persons will be transferred to the hospital for a second testing.

Lebanon is in the middle of an economic tragedy (prior to the pandemic). It has serious issues, namely corruption, yet it seems to know how to be thorough in dealing with the coronavirus.

One must also add that both the population and the media have been lucid from day 1 (everyone was aware of the tsunami ahead prior to day 1). The media may have even pushed the government to act faster. Regardless, the government of tiny bankrupt Lebanon listened and delivered efficiently. First, there were health measures at the airport. Then came the full lockdown of airport and land borders. One must also say that schools closed as soon as the first case was diagnosed. Churches and mosques closed very early on. Businesses followed, etc. Among the measures, on April 6, 2020, Lebanon freed about one third of the country’s inmates over fears of spread of the coronavirus in (overcrowded) prisons.

Good luck to Lebanon in its confinement and deconfinement measures.

Talking about deconfinement, and to conclude this post, Bambi would like to salute the wisdom of her niece Stéphanie who turned 18 lately ?. As she said, “even with deconfinement [at least a first stage of it], I will still be careful/stay at home… I do not want to bring the virus to my parents”.

Bambi would like to thank her friend Amale for sharing this troubling piece of news.  

The American University of Beirut (AUB) is one of the most distinguished universities in the Middle East and in the world.

Degrees awarded at the AUB are officially registered with the New York Board of Regents. The university’s operating budget is about US$423 million, with an endowment of approximately US$605 million. The beautiful AUB campus is composed of 64 buildings, including the American University of Beirut Medical Center with its 420 beds, three museums, four libraries, and 7 dormitories.

Sadly, the AUB announced that it is expecting to lose millions in revenue.

To use its President (Dr. Fadlo Khuri)’s own words: “This is the result of a confluence of calamities, starting with the collapse of the Lebanese economy, now compounded by the COVID-19 pandemic and associated global recession, which may yet develop into the first global depression since the 1930s”.

As you can read in the message below (PDF attached), some possible avenues to save the AUB could include the following steps: “closure of an as-yet undetermined number of programs and departments, the departure of a number of our community members, furloughs, a halt to capital expenditures, a near complete cancellation of university sponsored travels, leaves and conferences for the foreseeable future, and a review of the current benefits system”.

As Dr. Fadlo stated: “Make no question and have no doubts, everyone will be affected—from our senior leadership which will take significant pay reductions, to faculty members who have seen their buying power reduced, to students and their families who are struggling more than ever to pay tuition fees, to our staff who comprise our most financially challenged group. All will contribute in significant measure. All of us at AUB are fully dedicated to the future of the institution. There is no time for division or scoring of points while the university’s survival is at stake”.

It is so sad to see Lebanon’s economy falling apart… Today, a monument, or rather a beacon of light, like the AUB, is facing financial adversity.

The AUB’s motto is “That they may have life and have it abundantly”.  Yes, life could… and MUST go on!

Keeping this moto in mind, Bambi agrees with Dr. Fadlo who said: “It is my deep conviction that Lebanon and the region have no hope whatsoever if AUB cannot fulfill its mission. Saving AUB must be our only priority. And save it we will.”

Yes, please save the AUB!! Along with it, please save Lebanon!

May Lebanon know how to save itself…

Below you can read the message of Dr. Fadlo R. Khuri, MD, President of the AUB

https://www.aub.edu.lb/President/Documents/Messages/fiscal-20-21.pdf

This cartoon, entitled “Freedom 70”, is signed by Mr. Yannick Lemay (Journal de Montréal).

The cartoon refers to the 70+ who were allowed four new rights in Québec:

First, to go out for a walk without a supervision.

Second, to see their loved ones.

Third, to go do their groceries in essential businesses (food stores and pharmacies; the latter applies only to remote regions of the province).

Fourth, to engage in activities in and outside of their residence, provided they will respect physical distancing (the latter does not apply yet to seniors in Montréal, Laval, and, Montérégie).  

To conclude this post, for fun, watch the couple getting out of their residence (for seniors). The lady, who is wearing a mask, is saying: “I knit us some masks”. Watch the guy with the victory sign, saying: “Yeah!!! Grocery store! Pharmacy! Here we come!”

On the street, you can see a few virus paintings.

Freedom 70 refers to the freedom of getting out of confinement. A clever reference to freedom 65 or 55… or 95 for some (retirement age).

About 200 stars, along with other intellectuals, signed an editorial in Le Monde, urging world leader “not to go back to normal“, after the coronavirus pandemic. They wish for a “radical change” of the system against “consumerism“.

They wrote that “the ecological catastrophe is a meta-crisis, because consumerism has lead us to deny life itself: life of plants, of animals, and lives of a large number of human beings. Pollution, global warming, and destruction of natural spaces have lead the world to a breaking point“.

“Thus, they solemnly call for leaders and citizens to extract themselves from the untenable logic that is still prevalent in order to finally work to on a deep overhaul of objectives, of values, and of economies”.

Make no mistake. They are not talking about concrete solutions like encouraging local economies or re-thinking our economic dependence on China (for everything, especially medical equipment and medication!). They are not saying, let’s protect nature and ecology. They are selling cliché ideas but urging world leaders to increase their power on lives further and globally (sort of a global communism) where we can hear the following inner message: Human beings are bad, especially in the West, AND… capitalism is bad.

You can read the news in both English and French below.

English:

https://www.firstpost.com/health/coronavirus-outbreak-robert-de-niro-joaquin-phoenix-among-others-sign-editorial-urging-world-leaders-against-returning-to-normal-8339131.html

French:

https://www.journaldemontreal.com/2020/05/06/lapres-covid-19-des-artistes-et-scientifiques-disent-non-a-un-retour-a-la-normale

https://www.lemonde.fr/idees/article/2020/05/06/non-a-un-retour-a-la-normale-de-robert-de-niro-a-juliette-binoche-de-joaquin-phoenix-a-angele-l-appel-de-200-artistes-et-scientifiques_6038775_3232.html

As Mr. Levant tweeted today: “Last year, Trudeau banned our reporters from the election debates. So we sued and a court ordered him to let us report. Now, Trudeau bans us from asking questions at his pandemic press scrums. So we’re suing him again”.

Here is his 9-page lawsuit, if you are interested in reading his arguments: http://LetUsReport.com

Below you can watch a video posted by Mr. Levant on YouTube.

Bambi is sorry for Mr. Levant because she finds his work clever and informative. This being said, like with any other person (whether a journalist or her spouse ?), she can agree or disagree, depending on the topic or the perspective.

Most importantly, whether it is Mr. Levant or it is someone else, this story is a red flag for democracy. Indeed, we should never take the latter from granted, even in a beautiful country like ours. Believe me, when we originally come from another part of the world that sometimes struggles with democracy (civil war or current turmoil), we are even more concerned…

Why is Mr. Trudeau “silencing” independent and critical voices, like Mr. Levant?

Is Mr. Trudeau afraid to see a reflection of himself in the mirror of a question asked by Mr. Levant or by one of his staff?

Perhaps he does not trust that we, Canadians, can handle the truth, whether in the middle of a pandemic or not?

The truth helps people adjust in life. The truth liberates. The truth empowers. The truth also brings people closer to each other. This means that the truth can bring Mr. Trudeau and us closer in this covid-19 pandemic.

For example, Bambi watched Mr. Trudeau on TV the other day (Tout le Monde en parle). He did an excellent job because he allowed himself to be true.

Bambi hopes he will also allow himself to be fair with Mr. Levant (like with his peers from other media). By doing so, he will be “truly true” and, most importantly, at an equal (closer!) distance with all Canadians.  

To conclude this post, in case Mr. Trudeau’s entourage forgot it, he is supposed to be the PM of Canada. The last time Bambi checked the world’s map, Canada was VERY far from Syria, Iran, Saudi Arabia, North Korea, China, etc. Thank God!

Bambi just read wonderful news about Sudan.

This country finally made women’s genital mutilation illegal. In other terms, it has criminalized this barbaric practice.

Female genital mutilation, which most Sudanese girls and women have endured, is deeply rooted in cultural traditions or religious beliefs, etc. Thus, it may take some time for behaviours to change. For instance, in Kenya, such practice continues in some of its ethnic communities, despite a ban since 2011 (https://www.voanews.com/africa/kenya-fighting-end-female-genital-mutilation-2023).

Nevertheless, what a historic day for Sudan. Bravo!

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-52502489

Sudanese government to criminalize female genital mutilation

https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/01/africa/sudan-fgm-banned-intl/index.html

).

Our economy is literally falling apart (or, at least, has taken a BIG hit). MANY industries are collapsing or seriously struggling. Perhaps over 2 million Canadians are off work :(.

Despite all the above, what did Mr. Trudeau do today? He gave about CAD $846.719 million to the World Health Organization!

The World Health Organization (WHO) declared the covid-19 pandemic with much delay (6 weeks or so), and the Canadian government was slower in closing our borders, even if the response has improved later (finally and thanks). The reality remains that the VERY early stages of a pandemic are critical, if we want to contain the spread of the virus as much as possible.

This being said, the WHO has been”hijacked” by China (and other countries that the latter invests in, in order to earn their votes, including African countries, etc.).

Despite all this, we must remain human and help… but why that much Mr. Trudeau?

To fill the gap left by the USA? To show the world that you (we) are better than Mr. Trump? To ensure your UN seat? Or… simply because you are out of your mind today?

Yesterday night, Bambi saw a more reasonable Mr. Trudeau on TV (Tout le monde en parle), she even wrote a post about it. Where is he? Can we have him back, please?

By the way, where is our opposition?

Of course, Bambi means where is Mr. Maxime Bernier when Canada needs him? Unfortunately, he was not re-elected in the fall. Intellectually, he would have been good in confronting this idea (of over funding the WHO) with some common sense?

Sadly, common sense is not that common in Canada and in the world.

To conclude this post on a lighter note, here is an earlier cartoon by Mr. Yannick Lemay. It shows “Santa Justin”. Of course, our government has no choice BUT to support citizens and industries. Bravo and thank you. However, as per the cartoon, the deficit to future generations is over $252 billions… and Mr. Trudeau is singing “it is not over yet, this is just the beginning“.

Indeed, today, he proved us one more time that it is not over yet. Mr. Trudeau, it is perhaps time to consider taking a little break from your role of Santa, even if you enjoy it. While at it, how about also re-considering your “globalist” idealistic vision of the world? How will it serve us, Canadians, besides increasing our public debt further?

Perhaps if you explain to us some of the benefits or interests, from your perspective, we may see things differently? Perhaps we can follow you in your logic? For now, it is challenging for Bambi to understand this logic, even if she has an interest in seeing more vulnerable countries being supported (including her birth country, Lebanon).

For now, the only question that comes to her mind is like the title of this post: “Is Mr. Trudeau out of his mind”?