Author: Bambi

Thank you to the New Wark Times for the following article:

Backgrounder: Police review may have implications for Sackville

Local Sackville citizens know that our last municipal police force was corrupt (i.e., kids of officers selling drugs to youth). Bambi heard this in 2008 when she first moved to our town and kept hearing it by different local people over the years.

The story above played a role into the decision to bring the RCMP police to Sackville, NB.

In other municipalities (e.g., Miramichi in NB and Amherst, NS), municipal police forces also do an excellent job, just like our RCMP here in Sackville.

For instance, Bambi knows women who have been protected in stories of domestic violence. She also knows women and men who benefited from the security provided by local police. Security/support that has been inspiring to witness, especially in times where we have heard about RCMP-related tragedies in the media ☹ . Luckily, all of them are being investigated, in addition to the federal parliamentary committee looking into allegations of “systemic racism”.

Thanks to the RCMP in our town, some foster children/youth have had the wonderful opportunity to get a training in baby sitting, with local youth. For everyone, and especially to youth at risk, it is necessary to have positive role models in life. We are lucky to have devoted officers in our community.

NB youth at risk elsewhere in our province (e.g., Miramichi Police Force) also benefit from community programs such as the ‘Kids “N” Kops’, which is “a joint initiative of Big Brothers/Big Sisters and the Miramichi Police Force and has been held each summer for 14 years”. As a clinician, researcher, and foster parent, Bambi has collaborated with police services, in the context of youth with disruptive behaviour, in more than on jurisdiction, including NB, and she is impressed by the latter:

Community Programs

To come back to the RCMP, what Bambi likes about our federal police is that its mandate is just for 5 years in each location across our country.

The above, although tough when we want to build a family, is meant to help prevent local corruption. It would be perhaps informative to assess this aspect of the policing job. Bambi does not know if this has been officially conducted. If so, what can we learn from the data?

We surely need to investigate all the tragic stories by RCMP and/or other police forces, including the NS tragedy nearby ☹ and, of course, each of the latest tragic cases in NB. Luckily, this is being done by an independent entity. Best wishes for answers fast as families, communities, police force, municipalities (and all of us!) deserve the truth, for closure and to efficiently prevent similar tragedies in the future.

In sum, in NB, Bambi had AN EXCELLENT police service, as a citizen AND as a foster parent. Some stories could have turned into sad end results or even into tragedies (including violent ones). Thanks to our RCMP, everyone involved was safe and sound.

This is why, according to Bambi (citizen, foster parent), the decision to bring the RCMP to Sackville was and keeps being a wise decision. Personally, she hopes we will keep benefiting from having the RCMP in our town!

Like Mr. Mathieu Bock-Côté, Bambi refuses to fit limited identities (e.g., BIPOC or “Black, Indigeneous, and People of Coulour” or whatever other funny trendy acronyms… even if it is “deer of colour” ?).

She is just a deer. Period.

You can call her an immigrant, if you wish, because she is a first-generation immigrant (for over 30 years now).

Most importantly to her, she is a proud Canadian. She will remain proud… even if our society “succeeds” in destroying both its common sense and unity, with much ideology and less substance.

Bambi is a deer as well as a human being (yes it can happen!) who is Canadian, whilst being a New Brunswicker. She is also a Québecker who happens to also be Lebanese (with much pride of both!). Thus, she is also Arab (with tenderness, especially that the Arab world is in its darkest period of time ever)/Middle-Eastern, and Mediterranean (she is biased she knows… for her, the latter remains the most beautiful sea of the world, excluding our Atlantic ocean for sure ?).

All those trendy categories or sub-categories Bambi refuses to be re-assigned into, just like Mr. Bock-Côté (e.g., white, black, brown, yellow, etc.).

How can we succeed in truly respecting, and even embracing, others’ identity/ies if we do not have enough self-knowledge of/self-respect for our own identity/ies?

Thanks to Mr. Bock-Côté for describing to us the “absolute toxicity” of the “2020 identity reassignment”, to use his own words (an English translation is followed by the original tweet):

“Identity reassignment 2020

The new dominant ideology: I have seen myself as a Québecer, placing the French language at the heart of his collective identity and a historical adventure of four centuries. I learn that I am only a “white man”, and that apparently the colour of my skin is more important than my language, my culture, and my history. I must dissociate myself from the history of Québec and make myself united with the history of English Canada and the British Empire, due to skin colour. I finally learn that if I refuse this forced reassignment of identity, which uproots me in addition to abolishing my memory to racialize me, I fall into racism and colonialism. In other words, because I refuse to let myself be mentally colonized by the American imaginary, I would thus reveal my overall complicity with “white” colonisalism.

All of this becomes absolutely toxic.”

We used to be told that those who do not turn “climate change” into a religion are deniers of “science”… but which science are we talking about?

Now, we are told that those who do not see “systemic racism” everywhere are deniers of racism… because they are racist. We do not even mention the science anymore. No time for that. We establish the conclusions before the facts. This is it and we should agree… If we don’t, we are racist.

We are not being told anything about the definition of this so-called “systemic racism”. We just need to admit that it exists and then agree with whatever actions being demanded in its name.

Does that make any sense? Perhaps to some human beings in Canada, in the States, and around the world… but surely not to Bambi… and to silent deer with a free mind that do not buy ideas blindly without thinking about them first.  

Here are the articles from different media, interestingly almost having the same title ?. Notice the “could not agree”. It implies there is something wrong with their perspective, and not that they have a different perspective or they just “do not agree” with this perspective.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/premiers-systemic-racism-trudeau-letter-1.5629048

https://www.stcatharinesstandard.ca/ts/news/canada/2020/06/26/first-ministers-couldnt-agree-on-condemning-systemic-racism-in-declaration-trudeau-says.html

https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/first-ministers-couldn-t-agree-on-condemning-systemic-racism-in-declaration-pm-1.5001255

Of course, Bambi is saying so whilst knowing that bad people exist (in all groups) and good people exist (in all groups). Of course, racism exists. Discrimination exists. We are surely far from being a perfect country or a perfect province. We still have a lot of concrete work to do for the justice to our first nations. However, all in all, we are not that bad.

Despite all our vices, we are NOT systematically racist… at least according to Bambi.

Below is a refreshing article by Mr. Tarek Fateh published yesterday in the Toronto Sun and entitled Why Jagmeet Singh needs to apologize.

FATAH: Why Jagmeet Singh needs to apologize

It is sad for Bambi to see the increasingly poor intellectualism in our country.

In our passion for social justice, why aren’t we wise enough to rise above fanaticism and identity politics in order to foster a truly productive national debate?

Not just slogans… Not just senseless words of accusations.

Federal politicians can learn from Québec’s national debate on reasonable accommodation, for instance. Québeckers learned from it. Their politicians translated the lesson into “their” policy on secularism. Similar to what they did to protect the French language in their province.

No more cheap insults, please. No more empty words of virtue signalling.

Just a deep conversation among smart adults.

Is this too much to expect from our leaders and from ourselves, in today’ society?

Mr. Singh, please apologize to Mr. Therrien… and let’s move on.

There is a reason why Québec is called “la belle province”. Its slogan is “Je me souviens” (“I remember”). Pandemic times or not, Bambi will always remember and celebrate this day, praying for healthier days for this province/nation.

Québec is a wonderful part of our country and… of the world!

It is inspiring to many for having succeeded in preserving its heritage and in flourishing, at all levels, despite being a minority in North America. Bravo to Québec. Indeed, MANY francophone/phile people/places in the world, including Lebanon, look up to Québec as an inspiring example for keeping the French language alive.

For fun, below is a song by a talented singer-songwriter from France. Of note, Mr. Yves Duteil wrote this beautiful song in 2010, time at which he was the Mayor of “Précy-sur-Marne” ? (from 1989 to 2014). His song pays tribute to the French language spoken in Québec. Further below, you can hear another beautiful song, which is a sort of an (informal) national anthem of love for Québec. “Merci Monsieur” Gilles Vigneault!

Oh, one more thing, since today is also the name day of Bambi’s second cousin, she will also say: “Bonne fête Jean” to a talented young man (i.e., now a skilled pilot!), called Jeannotti as a baby, perhaps still known as Jeannot… at least by close ones ?.

All this being said, Bambi will joyfully conclude this post by singing Mr. Vigneault’s gens du pays (video with English sub-titles)!

His name is Nicolas Doghlass. He graduated yesterday from the American University of Beirut (AUB) with the most prestigious distinction in his field of studies, architecture.

Mr. Nicolas Doghlass is smart, creative, diligent, humble, and with a heart of gold!

In addition to his talent in architecture, he is a skilled soccer player, and an entrepreneur (even at his young age).

Of note, Mr. Doghlass and his peers graduated after a year spent in a revolution (due to Lebanon’s financial crisis) and the covid-19 pandemic.

Bambi wishes Nicolas all the best in life!

To conclude this post, here is a picture taken from his mother’s twitter account that made Bambi’s heart swell with pride.

Here a quick google translation of an article from La Presse:

https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lapresse.ca%2Factualites%2Fregional%2F2020-06-22%2Fun-troncon-de-la-route-139-portera-le-nom-de-jean-lapierre

Today, the Government of Québec announced the new name of Route 139 to immortalize the memory of Mr. Jean Lapierre, in the presence of his children, Ms. Marie-Anne and Mr. Jean-Michel Lapierre, who survived their parents. As a reminder, in the 2016 small airplane accident, they also lost their mother, two uncles, and an aunt, along with the pilot.

Bambi paid tribute to Mr. Lapierre in an earlier post honouring “Maman Dion” (Céline’s mom) and the Magdalen Islands. What a tragic loss his death, along with his family members… Not just for his mother and children but also to those beautiful islands, in the Atlantic ocean (nearby but part of Québec), for all of us across Canada, including his beloved Québec (especially Granby and the Eastern Townships).

Mr. Lapierre was a federal liberal MP (1979-1992), a Canadian Minister of Transport (2004-2006), a columnist, and an excellent TV/radio broadcaster. He was appreciated by many citizens, including Bambi ?.

Bambi thought of Ms. Lapierre (his mother) at the beginning of the covid-19 pandemic. No clue why… perhaps whilst thinking of our seniors or listening to a song or remembering good family memories in the Magdalen Islands. She wondered how she is going through this health crisis, especially at her older age, and after her tragic life losses (i.e., the death of her kids at their father’s funeral).

Today, she would like to dedicate Mr. Robichaud’s beautiful song included in the earlier post (see the end of this post) to the Lapierre family and to all the Magdalen Islanders!

Good-bye grande dame “Maman Dion” and… long live the Magdalen Islands!

What Mr. Mario Dumont is describing Bambi understood a while ago.

First, she voted for Mr. Trudeau’s government the first time, precisely in the hope of seeing Canada re-playing a role in the international scene.

Second, despite this, she was quick to see the superficiality of that balloon burst before the second elections (i.e., she did not vote for Mr. Trudeau again, which is contrary to her usual voting pattern).

Whether we (fully?) agree with Mr. Dumont’s thoughtful article, it is refreshing to read a deep reflection by a journalist (a luxury nowadays).

The night before the UN vote, Bambi thought about all this in her mind. Even if she saw the above, she prayed in her heart for the best interests of Canada (it may seem odd to pray for our country. She usually does so for Lebanon only… but, these days, she is concerned about us).

Anyhow, Bambi thought to herself (and asked God): If this UN seat is good for Canada, let it be. If not, please let it be. That was her wish for Canada, even if the federal government invested our tax money and much efforts to make this UN saga a success story for Mr. Trudeau. On the contrary, it was a fiasco for Canada (congrats to Norway, the winner).

Without much of Bambi’s blahablahblah, here is a quick translation of Mr. Mario Dumont’s article published on Saturday, June 20, in the Journal de Montréal.

Mr. Trudeau reads French. It is Bambi’s hope that he will read Mr. Dumont’s article one day, to learn from it:

https://www.journaldemontreal.com/2020/06/20/la-balloune-petee

“Oh ! It doesn’t look very serious as a title. However, no image can better represent what happened to Justin Trudeau in Canada this week. A beautiful big pink bubble … which bursts. And everyone realizes that it was only air.

The vote to bring Canada back to the UN Security Council was to become the consecration of Justin Trudeau’s great success on the international stage. The story was well presented: Canada, which had become despised in the world because of the evil Harper, was finding the way to universal love. Animated by the generous Justin, bearer of all good causes, the “most best” country in the world would once again become the most loved.

But it was all just porridge for cats.

Canada has never come down as low under Stephen Harper as what the Trudeau team said with the help of some media. And the supposed comeback of Canada pulled by superhero Justin with his cape never happened. It was all a story, wind, air.

Catastrophic result

Several analysts have pointed out: Canada’s result has been worse this year than the slap of ten years ago. Fewer votes for Canada against much smaller adversaries. Yet Justin Trudeau ran a campaign, made promises, distributed our money, hoping to convince poorer countries to express their love for Canada.

Justin Trudeau’s supposed return policy to the world is therefore a failure. But what exactly was this policy based on? Basically one thing: fashionable themes. Justin Trudeau donned fashionable socks to bring fashionable causes to the international stage.

The environment, multiculturalism, feminism, we can be sympathetic to the themes. But let’s be serious. The great political leaders on the world stage look at the issues in depth, they measure the credibility of their counterparts, they weigh the interests of their country. They do not allow themselves to be touched by empty words on good causes.

Taken seriously?

Justin Trudeau made a strong impression in his early months by the freshness of the speech. However, all of them later clearly understood that many of his good intentions were not based on a fundamental reflection or on a results strategy. Words, words and more words. Ah, yes … and also a photo! One wonders if he is still taken seriously by other leaders.

Hopefully at least this week, the Trudeau government will have learned its lesson. Canada must no longer be the kind dreamer who joins all the movements to be in the wind. Canada must pursue a strategy of international relations based on its interests, its economy, with allies and other countries before which it is better to stand up for its principles.”

For the CBC, anything that is not radical left is far-right ?:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/michael-korenberg-resigns-ubc-1.5621268

Seriously now, this story is VERY worrisome:

Mr. Michael Korenberg has resigned from his position as chair (and board member) of the Uiversity of British Columbia (UBC)’s Board of Governors, effective immediately. The reason stated: liking tweets supporting US President Donald Trump and criticizing BLM protests.

We are free to have any opinion we wish in life. We are free to like or dislike any online picture or comment. We are free to think that this story (and the way it is being covered in our public media) speaks volume about the totalitarian times ahead.

We may be totalitarian when we are either to the “far-right” OR far-left.

Today, the UN, Canada, and what they call “global” causes are all to the left. Is this a coincidence?

Bambi is eager to see the end of the elections in the Unites States, regardless of its outcome, just hoping Canada (+ the USA and the world) would renew with sanity again.

According to Bambi non-expert citizen’s opinion, Mr. Korenberg should not apologize.

Never apologize to the mob in life!

First, we finally heard a wise (former) politician… Nowadays, one must be a “former leader” to have the courage and lucidity of being wise:

Mr. Mulcair stated yesterday the following: “Mr. Singh had no reason to accuse Mr. Therrien of racism and he should now apologize”. He considers this accusation to be serious.

Mr. Jagmeet Singh, it is time to be wise now. Even NDP folks are saying so.

Your apologies are overdue… but it is never too late to act like a gentleman in life.

Sadly, instead of apologizing as polite Canadians usually do, Mr. Singh seemed to insinuate that he had a treatment of “systemic racism” at the House of Commons when he was expelled by the Speaker.

Singh’s wife even came to his so-called rescue in Narcity. For her, he is a “hero of anti-racism”, to use her own words. Normal, after all, he is also her heart’s hero ?:

https://www.narcity.com/news/ca/on/ottawa/gurkiran-kaur-sidhu-offers-support-to-husband-jagmeet-singh-after-he-called-mp-racist

Mr. Singh seems to have forgotten about the following:

First, in a “noble” fight, we can fall into the trap of being unfair, especially when we are passionate about a topic. It is never too late to admit that we went too far in life. We, the citizens, respect our public servants even more when they know how to be humble. Mr. Singh’s apologies to Mr. Therrien would be indirectly to the Bloc Québécois and directly to the hearts of each Québecker… four days ahead of the “Saint-Jean Baptiste” (Québec national day). It would be a lovely gesture on your behalf. “Yalla, you can do it ?” (= Come on, in Arabic!).  

Second, the only systemic discrimination that Bambi sees in this incident is against Québec (French-Canadians of Québec). Not by the Speaker of the House of Commons, thank Goodness! It is rather by Mr. Singh and our PM who have both unwisely played identity politics (Ms. Bombardier may have guessed why).

Third, Bambi is also seeing increased systemic prejudice against our police officers on our streets and media, which would be contrary to the spirit of the noble cause of “systemic racism/discrimination”. It is both odd and troubling to see politicians behaving like that toward the servants of their own (our!) institutions. It is even surrealistic, to say the least.   

It is amazing how no one dares to say anything nowadays. For Bambi, it is strange to see Canada increasingly resembling Syria (more authoritarian) and decreasingly Lebanon (more democratic)… Is it normal to have all our opposition parties that well aligned with the party in power, and with MOST of the mainstream media, at least the English ones?

What would have Mr. Jack Layton said about all this, had he been still alive today ☹? She bets that he would have not been proud today of Mr. Singh’s attitude. Indeed, he used to respect Québec. Québec respected and loved him back. We all did!

Anyhow, here is Ms. Bombardier’s powerful text, published in the Journal de Montréal, translated into English:

https://www.journaldemontreal.com/2020/06/20/le-quebec–une-province-raciste

As this “false news” circulates across Canada, last Wednesday, the leader of the NDP, Jagmeet Singh, called the Bloc Québécois House leader Alain Therrien a racist. The leader of the NDP was kicked out of the House of Commons for using a word classified as unparliamentary.

The leader of the Bloc Québécois asked him to apologize, which the latter refused to do. Prime Minister Trudeau has said that the Bloc is paying the price for refusing to admit that systemic racism is a scourge in Canada.

The leader of the Bloc, Yves-François Blanchet, acknowledged that “residual traces of racism exist in Canadian institutions”.

But he believes that we must refrain from generalizing by associating all members of a community with this racism.

The Bloc therefore takes issue with the accusations made against the Legault government, which voted for Bill 21 [the bill on secularism].

His opponents describe the French-speaking majority, which supports François Legault, as racist.

Anger

It is understandable that Jagmeet Singh’s strong anger was explained by the exchange of tense looks when he voted on his motion to recognize systemic racism in the RCMP.

Mr. Singh therefore interpreted the look of the Bloc Québécois House leader and the gesture that accompanied him as a rejection of his words.

He felt somehow rejected as a racialized person.

And so here is the Gordian knot which apparently all white people who seem to be put in the same bag have to face.

Today’s whites are said to be the heirs of yesterday’s slavers and all those who for centuries have colonized, exploited, despised, and discriminated against non-whites.

On the whole earth and even in the heart of the villages of Québec.

How can we organize more civilized debates on this ever-growing theme?

Can Québeckers, themselves humiliated, poor and made to feel guilty by a limited catholicity, be locked up now in a racist status of which they would be oblivious?

Attacks

How can we resist these destabilizing attacks which make them systemic racists by the mere fact of their skin colour and their battles to protect their language, always flouted, and their distinct culture, which includes secularism?

Should the majority of Québec become silent again, fold their backs, make their mea culpa and leave it to others to now define what it is?

Formerly French Canadians, we have renamed ourselves Québecers to include all the citizens of Québec.

And here we see minorities excluding themselves from belonging to Québec in the name of race and religion.

What a regression of universalist values!

Should we expect all of Canada to decide to exclude “racist” Québec from the Canadian federation so as not to tarnish the image of virtue and purity of a postnational Canada?

It would be reverse separatism.

In the international media, articles vehiculated these prejudices about Québec today.

It is doubtful that the Canadian embassies would be quick to correct this perception, which tarnishes the image of Québec and its inhabitants.

Québec society thus finds itself in the camp of racists.

What a calamity!”